qveenkeke1234 qveenkeke1234
  • 02-12-2015
  • History
contestada

why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing historical event

Respuesta :

Goten
Goten Goten
  • 02-12-2015
Because a primary resource would be an interview of someone in that event or their diary or something they wrote about that event. If you couldnt find anything, you would have to use the secondary source, a book or article written about that event but the author wasnt in it or there
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

The first antibiotic was made because of properties discovered in a certain type of a. blood. b. mold. c. spider. d. herb.
Into which modern country did the northernmost part of the inca empire extend
What are typical signs and symptoms for a urinary tract infection?
Which of the following sets of numbers could be the side lengths of a right triangle? 3, 4, and 7 9, 40, and 42 8, 15, and 16 20, 21, and 29
Abby is creating a professional development plan to advance in her current career. She has identified what job she wants and what skills and education are neces
Insects may be preserved in the hardened sap of trees called
What thinking lies behind Squealer's claim of victory in the Battle of the Windmill?
I want an explanation for number 7 please
the _____ movement led many Jews to settle in Palestine to rebuild their homeland. Yom Kippur Israel movement Baath Zionist
Simplify.... please help